Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
CoreScore 72:
- Participation of the tire models in professional tire tests and their test scores.
- Consumer reviews on the top tire selling websites.
We gather such data as the numbers of reviews and the ultimate score of the tire model on numerous tire-related websites such as amazon, tirerack, oponeo, simpletire, market.yandex, tyrereviews, and others. - Reviews written by the visitors to our website tiresvote.com.
Value, max: 100
Popularity of the model 16:
- Year of manufacture.
- The premium brand factor .
- The number of video reviews of the tire on youtube.com .
- The number of news items about the model .
- The number of times the tire was involved in professional tire tests.
- The fact of the tire being on the bestseller lists on such reputed websites as amazon, tirerack, oponeo, simpletire, and others.
- The number of tire types and sizes .
Value, max: unlimited
Value, average: 27
Key Facts
- This model is no longer available or might have limited distribution.
- Available Sizes in Line: 21
-
Used as Original Equipment (OE) only, not for sale.
Factory fitted to:- • Mercedes-Benz C-Class
- • Suzuki Swift
- • Nissan Juke
- • Fiat Punto
- Year Released: 2009
- Regions for sale: Europe
Description
Original Equipment on the Mercedes - Benz S-Class.
Features:
- Improved dry grip
- Enhanced cornering and straight-line stability
- Reduced fuel consumption and CO2 emissions
- Long treadlife
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia Latest News
-
Aug 20, 2010Video
βΊ Tire Test on Track - Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia Wins Top Auto Bild Recommendation
In its 2010 test of new generation eco-friendly tyres, Auto Bild, the leading German automobile magazine, has awarded the top ranking "very recommendable" rating to Bridgestone's Turanza ER300 Ecopia tyre. The test of five leading brands was aimed at evaluating fuel-saving performance and comparing it with safety levels, particularly in wet conditions.
Detailed Information
Type and Size
- Tire Model
- π Bridgestone / Turanza ER300 Ecopia
- Car Type
- Season
- Summer
- Rim Diameter
- 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 "
- Width
- 185 / 195 / 205 / 215 / 225 / 235 / 245 mm
- Aspect Ratio
- 40 / 45 / 50 / 55 / 60 / 65 %
- Construction
- Radial
Special Features
- Runflat
- No
- Mud and Snow
- No
- Extra Load
- Optional
Speed and Load
- Speed Index
- H (max 130 mph) ... Y (max 186 mph)
- Load Index (max load for a tire)
π Bridgestone / Turanza ER300 Ecopia Sizes & Specifications
Rim | Model | Size | Index | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
R14 | 195/60 R14 86H | 195/60 R14 | 86H | |
R15 | 195/65 R15 91H | 195/65 R15 | 91H | |
R16 | 185/55 R16 83V | 185/55 R16 | 83V | |
R16 | 195/55 R16 87H | 195/55 R16 | 87H | |
R16 | 195/55 R16 87V | 195/55 R16 | 87V | |
R16 | 195/55 R16 87W | 195/55 R16 | 87W | |
R16 | 205/55 R16 91H | 205/55 R16 | 91H | |
R16 | 205/55 R16 91V | 205/55 R16 | 91V | |
R16 | 205/55 R16 91W | 205/55 R16 | 91W | |
R16 | 205/60 R16 92H | 205/60 R16 | 92H | |
R16 | 205/60 R16 92W | 205/60 R16 | 92W | |
R16 | 225/55 R16 95W | 225/55 R16 | 95W | |
R16 | 225/55 R16 99W XL | 225/55 R16 | 99W | |
R17 | 215/55 R17 94W | 215/55 R17 | 94W | |
R17 | 225/45 R17 91W | 225/45 R17 | 91W | |
R17 | 225/50 R17 94W | 225/50 R17 | 94W | |
R17 | 225/55 R17 97Y | 225/55 R17 | 97Y | |
R17 | 235/55 R17 99W | 235/55 R17 | 99W | |
R17 | 235/55 R17 103V XL | 235/55 R17 | 103V | |
R17 | 245/40 R17 91W | 245/40 R17 | 91W | |
R18 | 245/45 R18 100Y XL | 245/45 R18 | 100Y |
Note! Have you driven on the π Bridgestone / Turanza ER300 Ecopia tire?
Please help thousands of other drivers make an informed tire choice and pick the correct tires for their car by submitting your review of the π Bridgestone / Turanza ER300 Ecopia.
Questions and Answers
-
Aug 20, 2010Video
βΊ Tire Test on Track - Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia Wins Top Auto Bild Recommendation
In its 2010 test of new generation eco-friendly tyres, Auto Bild, the leading German automobile magazine, has awarded the top ranking "very recommendable" rating to Bridgestone's Turanza ER300 Ecopia tyre. The test of five leading brands was aimed at evaluating fuel-saving performance and comparing it with safety levels, particularly in wet conditions.