The Kumho WinterCraft WP52 received a rating of 2.3 and took seventh place. It provides reliable performance on snowy roads, with safe handling and short braking distances in both wet and dry conditions. The tire also benefits from low noise levels during driving. However, its hydroplaning resistance is only average, which may be a consideration in very wet conditions.

The Kumho Wintercraft WP52 (91 H) earned a "satisfactory" rating, placing 15th in the test. With an EU label of C/B/B and a noise level of 72 dB, it is priced around €320 per set. This tire offers balanced and sporty driving dynamics, with short braking distances across various weather conditions. However, it has notable weaknesses, particularly its limited hydroplaning resistance and lower mileage, making it less durable in the long run. Despite these drawbacks, the Kumho Wintercraft WP52 remains a decent option for those looking for solid winter performance at a reasonable price, though its longevity may be a concern for some drivers.

The Kumho WinterCraft WP52 struggled on dry surfaces, with limited steering feedback and frequent need for corrections during cornering, which impacted its overall safety score. Despite showing better results on wet roads, its performance was still average, with long braking distances and poor hydroplaning resistance. However, on snowy and icy surfaces, the tire delivered a solid performance, providing stable handling and reliable braking. Its durability and low tread wear contributed positively to its environmental rating, but the slightly higher weight and average fuel efficiency detract from its overall appeal.

The Kumho WinterCraft WP52, ranking seventh, is recognized for its commendable snow performance and dry handling, along with efficient braking on both wet and dry pavement. It is also favorably priced. However, the tire exhibits weaknesses in wet conditions, specifically lacking in lateral stability on wet pavement and demonstrating subpar resistance to hydroplaning. While it excels in snow and dry conditions, these limitations on wet surfaces are important considerations for overall winter driving safety and performance.

The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 faces challenges with balance in its performance. It excels on dry asphalt, offering excellent performance in these conditions. However, it significantly lacks stability and grip on wet pavement, which diminishes its effectiveness in such conditions. Moreover, it registers the poorest results in snow tests and is characterized by high rolling noise, factors that might detract from its appeal for drivers in varied winter conditions.

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 boasts great longevity and is eco-friendly, but they can be a handful on wet and dry surfaces, often necessitating continuous steering corrections.

Pros:

• Durable and long-lasting.
• Minimal particulate emissions.
• Enhanced fuel economy.

Cons:

• Challenges in dry and wet performance.
• Noticeably heavy.

The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 demonstrates robust performance in dry conditions with commendable subjective handling across all tested environments. However, it is notably weaker in wet conditions, including both braking and handling, and exhibits low aquaplaning resistance.

Dynamic dry handling, high mileage, good economy. Limited grip level in the wet, heavy understeering when handling in the wet, low hydroplaning reserves.