Nokian’s new Seasonproof 2 is the company’s first product from its European factory. It arrives with revised construction, new tread pattern, and updated compound. To see how it performs in real conditions, Tyre Reviews tested it alongside six other all-season tyres in the popular 235/55 R18 size. All tyres were assessed in wet, dry, and snow conditions, as well as for comfort, noise, and rolling resistance.
Wet
Wet braking clearly separated the best from the rest. Nokian had the shortest stopping distance, followed closely by Goodyear and Hankook. The difference between Nokian and the worst-performing tyre was over eight meters — a meaningful gap at motorway speeds.
Wet Handling
- Goodyear
- Nokian
- Hankook
- Maxxis
- BFGoodrich
- Bridgestone
- Westlake
Info! Wet Handling in seconds.
Wet Braking
- Nokian
- Goodyear
- Hankook
- Maxxis
- Bridgestone
- BFGoodrich
- Westlake
Info! Wet Braking in meters (80–0 km/h).
Wet handling times were also competitive. Goodyear and Nokian led, with less than one-tenth of a second between them. Both offered stable, predictable balance. Hankook followed with slightly less grip near the limit but remained composed. Maxxis felt quicker to respond but was less consistent when pushed. BFGoodrich and Bridgestone understeered earlier and took longer to settle mid-corner.
Hydroplaning resistance was another strength for Nokian. It performed best in straight-line float speed and ranked near the top in curved hydroplaning. Maxxis led the latter category, maintaining grip deep into standing water. Westlake was weakest in both tests, showing early loss of contact and minimal feedback during recovery.
Straight Hydroplaning
- Nokian
- BFGoodrich
- Maxxis
- Bridgestone
- Goodyear
- Hankook
- Westlake
Info! Float Speed (km/h).
Lateral Hydroplaning
- Maxxis
- BFGoodrich
- Nokian
- Bridgestone
- Goodyear
- Hankook
- Westlake
Info! Remaining lateral acceleration (m/s²).
Dry
Dry handling times were close, with six tyres within one second. Hankook and Maxxis were the fastest, followed closely by Goodyear and Bridgestone. Nokian placed mid-pack but remained predictable. Westlake lagged, with longer times and slower responses in quick direction changes.
Dry Handling
- Hankook
- Maxxis
- Goodyear
- Bridgestone
- BFGoodrich
- Nokian
- Westlake
Info! Dry Handling in seconds.
Dry Braking
- BFGoodrich
- Bridgestone
- Maxxis
- Nokian
- Hankook
- Goodyear
- Westlake
Info! Dry Braking in meters (100–0 km/h).
Subjectively, Goodyear and BFGoodrich had the best steering response, offering precision without nervousness. Maxxis felt sharp but slightly abrupt. Nokian was smoother and more relaxed, making it easy to drive but less dynamic. Bridgestone and Hankook focused more on stability than agility.
Dry braking spread the group further. BFGoodrich stopped shortest, ahead of Bridgestone and Maxxis. Nokian again landed in the middle of the group. Goodyear and Hankook required longer distances, and Westlake was again at the bottom with the longest stopping distance in the test.
Overall, no major weaknesses were found in most tyres, but none could match Nokian’s wet performance in the dry.
Snow Performance
In snow handling, Nokian was the quickest. It combined lateral grip, balance, and clear feedback. Hankook and BFGoodrich followed, both showing strong traction and stability with minor differences in steering feel. Goodyear and Bridgestone understeered more but remained predictable. Maxxis had enough grip but was inconsistent at the limit. Westlake again finished last, showing limited control on snow-covered roads.
Snow Handling
- Nokian
- Hankook
- BFGoodrich
- Goodyear
- Bridgestone
- Maxxis
- Westlake
Info! Snow Handling in seconds.
Snow Traction
- Maxxis
- Hankook
- Goodyear
- BFGoodrich
- Nokian
- Bridgestone
- Westlake
Info! Snow Acceleration time (5–40 km/h).
Snow braking and traction tests confirmed Maxxis’s grip. It led both categories by a noticeable margin. Nokian was slightly behind in traction but second-best in braking. Hankook was consistent across all winter tests. BFGoodrich stayed close, while Bridgestone and Goodyear were adequate but didn’t match the leaders.
All tyres performed better than a summer tyre in these conditions. Still, Westlake’s lower grip made it harder to control. As a benchmark, we ran a Nordic winter tyre to show the performance gap — and as expected, it outclassed every all-season model.
Snow Braking
- Maxxis
- Nokian
- Hankook
- Goodyear
- BFGoodrich
- Bridgestone
- Westlake
Info! Snow Braking in meters.
Comfort & Noise
Subjective comfort scores were similar across the group. Hankook, Goodyear, and BFGoodrich were slightly ahead, thanks to well-controlled ride quality. Nokian was rated just behind, with slightly more impact harshness over larger imperfections. Maxxis and Bridgestone also performed well. Westlake was acceptable but had more body movement and less damping.
Subj. Comfort
- Hankook
- Goodyear
- BFGoodrich
- Maxxis
- Bridgestone
- Westlake
- Nokian
Info! Subjective Comfort Score.
Subj. Noise
- Goodyear
- Bridgestone
- BFGoodrich
- Nokian
- Maxxis
- Hankook
- Westlake
Info! Subjective In Car Noise.
In-cabin noise was generally well-managed. Goodyear, BFGoodrich, and Bridgestone were the quietest subjectively. Nokian had the lowest measured external noise but produced some extra sound during cornering. Hankook had a faint hum but remained quiet overall. Westlake stood out negatively again with a high-pitched tone under load.
Noise
- Nokian
- Hankook
- Goodyear
- Bridgestone
- BFGoodrich
- Maxxis
- Westlake
Info! External Noise (dB).
None of the premium tyres were problematic, and most differences would be hard to detect without direct comparison.
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency testing showed BFGoodrich with the lowest rolling resistance, followed closely by Westlake and Bridgestone. Nokian was slightly higher but still within a good range. Goodyear and Hankook followed. Maxxis had the highest rolling resistance, which may impact fuel consumption over time.
Rolling Resistance
- BFGoodrich
- Westlake
- Bridgestone
- Nokian
- Goodyear
- Hankook
- Maxxis
Info! Rolling Resistance (kg/t).
These results are relevant for high-mileage drivers or hybrid and electric vehicle owners. The difference between best and worst was more than 25%, which could affect long-term operating costs.
Conclusion
Nokian’s Seasonproof 2 is a major step forward. It led in wet braking, hydroplaning resistance, and snow handling, while also staying quiet and efficient. Dry performance was average but not weak, and comfort was acceptable.
BFGoodrich combined top dry braking, low rolling resistance, and solid comfort. Goodyear remained balanced, especially in wet handling. Hankook was the best in dry and snow handling. Maxxis impressed in snow grip but had higher energy use. Westlake offered good efficiency but finished last in nearly every key safety category.
Seasonproof 2 puts Nokian among the leaders in the all-season segment — not just in snow, but across the board.
Results
1st Place:Nokian / Seasonproof 2
Quick Take
Nokian Seasonproof 2
The Seasonproof 2 is Nokian’s most competitive all-season tire to date. It led in wet braking, resisted hydroplaning better than any rival, and offered the fastest snow lap times in the test. Steering was relaxed but stable, with high composure in both dry and winter handling. Rolling resistance was average, and comfort slightly behind the best, but its all-weather control makes it the top choice.
Outstanding in wet and snow, with precise balance and safe behavior in extreme conditions.
2nd Place:BFGoodrich / Advantage SUV All Season
Quick Take
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
BFGoodrich delivered strong results across the board, combining excellent dry braking and top-tier comfort with good winter performance. It struggled slightly in wet braking and showed some understeer in handling, but remained safe and predictable. It also had the lowest rolling resistance in the test.
Efficient, quiet, and strong in dry and winter — a well-rounded option for year-round use.
3rd Place:Goodyear / Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Quick Take
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Goodyear stood out with excellent handling in both wet and dry. It was composed in the snow and scored maximum points for comfort and cabin noise. Braking distances were a bit long, and deep water performance was below average, but overall refinement remains a highlight.
Great all-rounder for daily driving with precise reactions and strong winter grip.
4th Place:Hankook / Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
Quick Take
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
Hankook delivered excellent snow performance, with strong traction, balanced handling, and predictable behavior. It also performed well in dry and wet conditions, though hydroplaning resistance was weaker than others. Comfort and road noise were among the best.
Ideal for mixed climates with frequent winter conditions, offering stability and softness.
5th Place:Maxxis / Premitra All Season AP3 SUV
Quick Take
Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV
Maxxis impressed with the best snow braking and traction in the group. It was fast in the dry and agile in wet handling, though braking distances were longer than average. Comfort was acceptable, and rolling resistance was the highest in the test.
Strong value with standout winter grip and confident handling, at the cost of efficiency.
6th Place:Bridgestone / Turanza All Season 6
Quick Take
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Bridgestone performed well in the dry and remained composed in all situations, but didn’t excel in any key test. Wet braking and snow grip were average, and while comfort and noise were good, it lacked the sharpness or security of the front-runners.
Consistent and safe, but slightly underwhelming in demanding conditions.
7th Place:Westlake / All Season Elite Z-401
Quick Take
Westlake All Season Elite Z-401
Westlake finished last across most categories. Wet braking was dangerously long, and hydroplaning resistance was well below the others. Snow performance was limited, and road noise was the highest. It offered decent comfort and low rolling resistance, but that’s not enough to compensate.
Low price, but compromised safety and grip make it unsuitable for real-world use.
