The Firestone Winterhawk 4 (91 H) received a "satisfactory" rating and ranked 18th in the test. It has an EU label of C/B/B with a noise level of 71 dB, priced at approximately €320 per set. This tire performs well in winter conditions, delivering solid handling on snow and offering reliable traction on wet roads. However, its steering response is delayed, and its mileage is somewhat limited compared to other models in the test. Despite these weaknesses, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 provides dependable winter performance, particularly in wet conditions, making it a reasonable option for drivers focused on safety in winter weather.

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 excelled in wet and winter conditions, offering reliable handling and control on slippery surfaces. It combined lateral and longitudinal forces effectively, making it easy to navigate through snowy and icy terrain. However, its dry road performance was lacking, with delayed steering response and a tendency to oversteer during sudden maneuvers. Frequent steering corrections were necessary to maintain stability, which could be challenging for less experienced drivers. The tire's braking performance on dry surfaces was also average, affecting its overall safety rating. Although it had good efficiency due to its low weight and fuel consumption, its tread life and durability were just adequate. Ideal for wet and snowy conditions, but less so for dry road performance.

The Firestone Winterhawk 4, occupying the ninth position, is conditionally recommended, particularly noted for its commendable snow performance and resistance to both straight and lateral hydroplaning. This tire also stands out for its affordability. However, it falls short in dry handling and demonstrates longer braking distances on both dry and wet pavement, aspects that may compromise safety and driving experience, especially in non-snow conditions.

Ranked at 20th place and categorized as not recommended, the Viking WinTech tire is noted for its effective handling in snow and on wet pavement. However, it faces significant challenges in dry conditions, exhibiting severe understeer and extended braking distances. Additionally, its relatively high rolling resistance is a concern, as it adversely affects fuel consumption and overall vehicle efficiency.

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 demonstrates robust performance in various conditions. It excels in wet performance, especially in resisting lateral aquaplaning, and offers solid braking on dry pavement with minor issues in informativeness. In winter conditions, it maintains good driving performance, although the braking distance on ice is notably longer. The tire is also lightweight and economical. However, its disadvantages include less effective dry handling, reduced tread life, and increased particulate emissions, indicating a lower resistance to wear.

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 has well-balanced performance and high hydroplaning resistance, but its rolling resistance is high.

Convincing snow qualities, low rolling noise, very good mileage. Only satisfactory dry qualities, longer wet and dry braking distances, moderate driving comfort.

Good on wet roads, snow and ice. Low fuel consumption (top mark). Weaknesses on dry roads.

High traction and good handling performance on snow. Good handling response on dry pavement (but the grip is generally lower than that of the leaders). Long braking distance and reduced grip on wet pavement. Increased risk of hydroplaning. Long braking distance on dry pavement. Distinct noise. Low riding comfort. Good.

The tenth place in the tournament bracket was occupied by the Firestone Winterhawk 4 (a product from a Bridgestone subsidiary).
Pros: very good overall winter performance, short stopping distance on snow and wet pavement, long expected mileage, affordable price.
Cons: understeer and increased stopping distance on dry pavement.

Good performance on wet surface, snow and ice. Poor dry performance.