The Pirelli Scorpion claims 1st place with best-in-test wet handling (38.71s) and near-top dry/wet braking (2nd/3rd). Its precise steering, directional stability, and balanced cornering elevate driving confidence, though higher rolling resistance and lower comfort (7/10) temper refinement.

The Michelin e.Primacy secures 2nd place, excelling in wet braking (24.64m, 1st) and comfort (10/10), while offering the lowest rolling resistance for unmatched efficiency. Its quiet, plush ride and eco-friendly design appeal to comfort-focused EV drivers, though dry braking (22.35m) and wet handling (39.44s) lag slightly behind sportier rivals.

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 secures 3rd place with best-in-test dry braking (21.75m) and predictable wet handling, though comfort (7/10) and wet braking (25.41m) trail rivals. Its balanced emergency stability and mild understeer ensure safety, but lacks the Pirelli’s steering precision.

The Continental PremiumContact 7 ranks 4th, delivering strong dry braking (21.9m, 3rd) and reliable wet handling (39.33s, 2nd). While excelling in emergency maneuvers and stability, its sluggish steering response and elevated wet braking distance (26.18m, 6th) reduce engagement compared to sportier rivals.

The Nexen N'Fera Sport SUV ranks 5th, showcasing strong wet braking performance (24.73m, 2nd) and notable improvements in hydroplaning resistance. However, it underperforms in dry braking (23m, 6th) and wet handling (39.94s, 6th), with testers criticizing its spongy steering, sluggish response, and unstable road feel. Despite closing the gap to premium rivals in objective metrics, its shift to a higher price bracket erodes Nexen’s traditional budget appeal.

The Nokian Hakka Black 3 SUV ranks 6th, offering competitive wet handling (39.34s, 3rd) and solid dry braking (22.55m, 5th). However, its comfort flaws—excessive noise and harsh shock absorption—drag it down, earning the lowest comfort score (6/10, 8th). While praised for its responsive, Pirelli-like handling, the Finnish tyre’s steep price (highest in the test) raises questions, as it sacrifices refinement and value despite grip-focused strengths.

he Michelin CrossClimate 2 ranks 7th, struggling in dry and wet performance (23.4m dry braking, 26.88m wet braking, 40.83s wet handling) as an all-season tyre competing against dedicated summer rivals. While its comfort (8/10, 3rd) stands out, significant understeer and sluggish responses on wet surfaces highlight its compromises. Testers caution against relying on this design in Sweden, advocating for dedicated seasonal tyres instead.

The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco ranks 8th, offering strong subjective comfort (9/10, 2nd) and low noise levels at an affordable price. However, its critical safety flaws—catastrophic wet handling (40.85s, 8th), unstable sliding, and severe understeer—make it dangerously unpredictable in emergencies. Despite its budget-friendly cost, testers strongly advise avoiding this tyre due to compromised control and the lowest moose test performance.