The Michelin CrossClimate 2 exhibits robust performance, especially in snow conditions where it leads the segment, and boasts the lowest noise level and rolling resistance in the test. However, its performance in wet braking and the high cost per kilometer due to average wear detract from its overall appeal.

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 impressively ranks third, showcasing a significant improvement in snow performance over its predecessor. It excelled in snow traction and handling, with a robust front end aiding in turns. In dry conditions, it topped the braking test and maintained consistent handling, though it lacked some rivals' sharpness. However, its performance dipped in wet conditions, particularly in deeper water, and its wet grip was less competitive. Notably, its rolling resistance and cabin noise levels were commendably managed.

The Michelin CrossClimate 2, securing second place, demonstrates robust capabilities in various conditions. In snow, it confidently passes tests, showcasing top-tier performance in almost all areas, except for braking. On wet surfaces, it exhibits a delayed reaction to course changes, although its hydroplaning resistance and braking are commendable. The tire excels on dry roads, evidenced by the shortest braking distances, impressive maneuverability in slalom, and minimal rolling resistance. The tire's superior performance on snow and dry pavement compensates for its average wet performance, further bolstered by its economical nature and low rolling resistance.

The Michelin Cross Climate 2, ranking second, excels notably in snow with its superior traction and braking performance, alongside stable cornering behavior. It also boasts outstanding braking performance on dry roads, though its evasive maneuvers tend to be sluggish yet safe. Its limitations become apparent in wet conditions, where it exhibits longer braking distances and weaker cornering grip. The tire's inherent damping is also on the lower side.

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 secures second place, continuing its impressive performance in all-season tire tests. It particularly shines in winter conditions, with superior performance in sub-zero temperatures and on snow, closely rivaling dedicated winter tires. Its dry asphalt performance is noteworthy, with significantly shorter braking distances compared to the Goodyear. Handling-wise, it's on par with its competitor, showing only a minimal time difference on a sport track.

However, its wet grip is somewhat compromised to favor snow performance. While it performs safely on wet tracks, exhibiting stable behavior and clear signaling of grip limits, it falls slightly behind the Goodyear in terms of stability and overall wet performance. This slight deficiency extends to other wet tests as well. Additionally, its fuel economy, while competitive, doesn't match up to Goodyear, consolidating its second-place ranking. The CrossClimate 2's primary limitation is its wet asphalt performance; if improved, it could have outclassed its competitors.

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 excels in snowy conditions, offering excellent driving dynamics and ice handling. It also performs admirably in dry conditions with dynamic handling and precise steering behavior. Additionally, the tire is noted for its good aquaplaning qualities and very good mileage, although it comes at a higher price.

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 showcased an exceptional performance, capturing the premier spot in the test. With its exceptional capabilities in dry braking and snow conditions, along with commendable comfort and aquaplaning resistance, it reaffirms its strong hold in the market. However, certain aspects related to wet conditions indicate room for further enhancement.

• Positive: Emerged as the test winner. Best-in-class performance in dry braking. Impressive grip in dry conditions. Superior aquaplaning resistance. Led the charts in snow braking and snow traction. Recorded the fastest snow handling lap. Exhibited very good levels of comfort. Remarkably low rolling resistance.

• Negative: Showed average results in wet braking. Performance in wet handling ranked 8th, indicating a need for improvement.

This Michelin model delivers excellent snow and dry performance, but on wet pavement it has long braking distances and is extremely prone to understeer. In addition, in the range of 30–50 km/h, an annoying wailing sound was heard.

Very good snow performance. Short braking distance on dry pavement. High steering precision. Good riding comfort. Average lateral stability on wet pavement. Short tread life. Poor environmental performance. Satisfactory.

The best snow performance on test by a margin, rivaling winter tyre ability, shortest dry braking with good grip in dry handling, high aquaplaning resistance, low rolling resistance. Limited grip in the wet grip tests with high levels of understeer.

No prominent issues found, good results on all types of surfaces. Great snow gripLow noise emission. Low rolling resistance. Minor gripes about wet handling response. Highly recommended.

Low weight. Good handling response on all types of surfaces. Excellent grip and stability during the emergency lane switching. Relatively long braking distance on wet pavement. Relatively rough ride.

Very short braking distance on wet and dry pavement. Weak traction on a slippery surface. Satisfactory.

Positive: Good snow performance. High resistance to aquaplaning. Low rolling resistance.
Negative: Tendency to understeer on wet roads. High price.
Verdict: Satisfactory.

The new Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a near flawless test, with the only weakness coming in the wet at cooler temperatures where it couldn't quite match the best. It was the most summer-like tyre in the dry, led both deep water tests, was one of the best in the snow, and had low noise and low rolling resistance. A really impressive performance from the new tyre, and a worthy upgrade to the CrossClimate+.
Positive: Clear leader in the dry, good wet handling, shortest wet braking at warmer temperatures, best aquaplaning resistance in both tests, one of the best tyres overall in the snow, low levels of noise, low rolling resistance.
Negative: Average wet braking at cooler temperatures, expensive.

Positive: New all-season tire with exemplary handling on snow and dry roads, short braking distances on dry surfaces, economical rolling resistance.
Negative: Slight understeer on wet roads.
Verdict: good.