The ADAC summer tire test series for 2024 kicks off with an examination of 16 current tire models in the 215/55R17 size, suitable for small crossovers and mid-size passenger cars.
In its inaugural 2024 test, ADAC scrutinized the characteristics of these tire models, which play an important role for drivers of small crossovers and mid-range cars. Unlike tires designed for high-performance or specialized vehicles, these models aim to offer a balanced mix of efficiency, comfort, and safety, without a focus on extreme performance metrics. The tests were conducted across various locations in Europe, assessing dry asphalt performance at Bridgestone's Italian test track and ADAC's own facility in Bavaria. Wet grip and noise levels were evaluated at Continental's proving ground in Germany. Additionally, tire wear resistance was tested on public roads near Landsberg am Lech, Germany, and on a certified Bridgestone rig.
All tire models were tested in terms of driving and safety features as well as for comfort and economic efficiency. Additionally, sustainability criteria are included in the standard evaluation of the tire test. Therefore, starting with the summer tire test of 2023, ADAC has adopted a new evaluation scheme for its tire tests: The final grade now consists of individual scores for driving safety and environmental impact.
The roster for this test included:
- Bridgestone / Turanza 6
- Continental / PremiumContact 7
- Debica / Presto UHP 2
- Dunlop / Sport Maxx RT2
- Falken / Ziex ZE310 Ecorun
- Fulda / SportControl 2
- Goodride / Solmax 1
- Goodyear / EfficientGrip Performance 2
- Hankook / Ventus Prime 4 K135
- Kumho / Ecsta HS52
- Linglong / Sport Master SA220
- Michelin / Primacy 4+
- Nexen / N Fera Primus
- Sailun / Atrezzo ZSR 2
- Semperit / Speed-Life 3
- Vredestein / Ultrac
The key test metrics on wet surfaces encompassed a variety of assessments. Braking tests measured the stopping distances with ABS from a speed of 80 km/h on both asphalt and concrete surfaces. For longitudinal and lateral hydroplaning, the tests determined the speed at which tires begin to hydroplane and measured the lateral acceleration force before hydroplaning in water layers of 7 mm and 5 mm, respectively. Handling was evaluated by the fastest possible navigation of a winding course by two test pilots. Lastly, lateral stability was tested through the maximum speed maneuvering on a wet, circular track.
Wet
In the detailed assessment of wet braking performance, the Continental PremiumContact led the pack, showcasing its prowess in stopping efficiently on wet surfaces. Following closely were Michelin Primacy 4 Plus and Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, indicating their strong performance in critical braking scenarios.
Wet Braking
- Continental
- Michelin
- Linglong
- Dunlop
- Sailun
- Falken
- Vredestein
- Fulda
- Debica
- Goodyear
- Bridgestone
- Kumho
- Hankook
- Nexen
- Goodride
- Semperit
Info! Wet braking in meters (80-0 km/h).
Wet Braking - Concrete
- Continental
- Kumho
- Vredestein
- Falken
- Michelin
- Nexen
- Linglong
- Debica
- Dunlop
- Fulda
- Goodyear
- Hankook
- Semperit
- Bridgestone
- Sailun
- Goodride
Info! Wet braking - concrete in meters (80-0 km/h).
When the surface shifted to concrete, the ranking saw some changes, highlighting the tires' adaptability to different wet conditions. Continental maintained its top position, while Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Vredestein Ultrac showed impressive results. In the straight hydroplaning tests, Bridgestone Turanza 6 emerged as the leader, demonstrating superior water displacement ability.
Straight Hydroplaning
- Bridgestone
- Vredestein
- Dunlop
- Fulda
- Falken
- Debica
- Semperit
- Goodride
- Sailun
- Michelin
- Nexen
- Goodyear
- Hankook
- Linglong
- Continental
- Kumho
Info! Float speed, (km/h).
Lateral Hydroplaning
- Vredestein
- Dunlop
- Fulda
- Debica
- Falken
- Goodride
- Bridgestone
- Nexen
- Semperit
- Goodyear
- Sailun
- Kumho
- Michelin
- Linglong
- Continental
- Hankook
Info! Lateral acceleration, m/s².
The lateral hydroplaning results were equally telling, with Vredestein Ultrac taking the lead, indicating its edge in lateral water displacement during cornering.
Dry
On the dry track, the lap times were closely matched among the contenders, yet the handling nuances set them apart. The Continental PremiumContact 7 distinguished itself in dry braking, showing a clear edge over its nearest competitors, with Michelin Primacy 4 Plus and Linglong Sport Master sharing a closely contested second place.
Dry Braking
- Continental
- Michelin
- Linglong
- Dunlop
- Sailun
- Falken
- Vredestein
- Fulda
- Debica
- Goodyear
- Bridgestone
- Kumho
- Hankook
- Nexen
- Goodride
- Semperit
Info! Dry braking in meters (100-0 km/h).
While lap times were tight, the Continental PremiumContact 7 stood out in dry conditions, not just in braking but also in handling, receiving acclaim for its superior dry grip and dynamic handling characteristics. Michelin and Linglong followed, demonstrating their prowess in dry braking. The Continental, in particular, was lauded for its prompt steering response and the overall driving experience it offered, setting a benchmark in the category for dry surface performance.
Treadwear and Value
In the tire wear category, Kumho Ecsta HS52 slightly outperformed Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, taking the top spot for durability. Interestingly, the Continental PremiumContact tied with Michelin Primacy 4 Plus for the third position, showing commendable wear resistance.
Kumho's victory in wear resistance, coupled with its cost-effectiveness, crowned it as the most economical choice, offering the lowest cost per 1000 km driven.
In the pricing segment, Linglong Sport Master emerged as the leader, offering the best price advantage, followed closely by Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 and Goodride Solmax 1, highlighting their market competitiveness.
Treadwear
- Kumho
- Goodyear
- Michelin
- Continental
- Semperit
- Hankook
- Bridgestone
- Falken
- Dunlop
- Debica
- Nexen
- Fulda
- Sailun
- Linglong
- Goodride
- Vredestein
Info! Predicted Tread Life (km).
Value
- Kumho
- Goodyear
- Semperit
- Linglong
- Hankook
- Debica
- Sailun
- Falken
- Continental
- Michelin
- Nexen
- Goodride
- Fulda
- Bridgestone
- Dunlop
- Vredestein
Info! Dollars/1000 miles based on mileage warranty.
Fuel Efficiency, Abrasion and Noise
Fuel consumption tests, conducted by ADAC through actual driving rather than machine testing, showcased a tight competition with Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2, Bridgestone Turanza 6, and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 sharing the top spot.
In the abrasion category, Michelin Primacy 4 Plus was distinguished for its low-wearing compound, contributing less to environmental pollution, underscoring Michelin's commitment to sustainability.
Fuel Efficiecny
- Sailun
- Bridgestone
- Hankook
- Goodyear
- Semperit
- Michelin
- Continental
- Goodride
- Kumho
- Nexen
- Linglong
- Debica
- Fulda
- Dunlop
- Vredestein
- Falken
Info! Fuel Efficiency (Litres/100 km).
Abrasion
- Michelin
- Goodyear
- Kumho
- Hankook
- Continental
- Semperit
- Linglong
- Falken
- Bridgestone
- Nexen
- Dunlop
- Debica
- Sailun
- Fulda
- Goodride
- Vredestein
Info! Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t).
Noise
- Sailun
- Linglong
- Michelin
- Goodyear
- Continental
- Bridgestone
- Falken
- Goodride
- Debica
- Hankook
- Nexen
- Semperit
- Fulda
- Dunlop
- Vredestein
- Kumho
Info! Noise (dB).
The noise test results for various tire brands show a range of external noise levels measured in decibels (dB). Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 is the quietest tire, followed by Linglong Sport Master and Michelin Primacy 4 Plus, indicating they are better choices for drivers seeking a quieter ride. Goodyear EfficientGrip Perfomance 2 and Continental PremiumContact also perform well in the noise test. Towards the higher noise end, we find tires like Hankook Ventus Prime 4, Nexen N Fera Primus, and Semperit Speed Life 3, with Kumho Ecsta HS52 being the noisiest among the tested tires. This suggests a significant variation in noise levels among different tire models, which could influence consumer choice based on their sensitivity to noise.
Overall Verdict: Choosing the Right Tire
Based on the test results, we can draw the following conclusions. In wet conditions, Continental PremiumContact excelled in braking performance, with Michelin Primacy 4 Plus and Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun also showing strong results. Bridgestone Turanza 6 stood out in hydroplaning tests, highlighting its safety features. In dry conditions, Continental PremiumContact 7 led in handling and braking, demonstrating superior grip and responsiveness. For tire wear, Kumho Ecsta HS52 emerged as the most durable and economical choice. Additionally, the tests indicated that there is no perfect tire that excels in every category, emphasizing the importance of choosing a tire based on individual needs and preferences.
Results
1st Place: Continental / PremiumContact 7 - Rated 2.0
Quick Take
Continental PremiumContact 7
The Continental PremiumContact 7 stands out in the ADAC Summer SUV Tire Test R17, securing the top position with exceptional performance in both dry and wet braking, showcasing its prowess in ensuring driving safety. It achieves the best scores in steering feedback and handling at limits, emphasizing its reliability in critical situations. However, the tire shows room for improvement in hydroplaning resistance, with average ratings in both straight and lateral scenarios. Its wear resistance and fuel consumption are commendable, indicating good longevity and moderate efficiency. The pricing and value metrics suggest a higher cost, which is something to consider against its performance benefits.
2nd Place: Michelin / Primacy 4+ - Rated 2.1
Quick Take
Michelin Primacy 4+
The Michelin Primacy 4+ demonstrates robust performance, securing a commendable second position with notable achievements in dry and wet braking. It offers good steering feedback and reliable handling, particularly in dry conditions. In wet scenarios, the tire maintains strong performance, though it falls slightly behind the leader, especially on concrete surfaces. Its resistance to hydroplaning is solid, yet not the best in the test. The Primacy 4+ shines in abrasion resistance, topping this category, and boasts impressive mileage and minimal wear. Environmental considerations are evident in its low weight and fuel efficiency. However, its cost and value proposition may warrant attention due to its higher pricing.
3rd Place: Kumho / Ecsta HS52 - Rated 2.3
Quick Take
Kumho Ecsta HS52
The Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2, in third place, showcases impressive ice performance and excels in snow traction, wet braking, and handling, including strong resistance to straight hydroplaning. It stands out for its very short braking distances on wet surfaces and effective performance on snow/ice. However, it falls short in dry handling, with lateral stability and steering response being less than ideal, impacting its ability to maintain the desired trajectory. Despite these drawbacks, the tire remains stable overall, ensuring a safe driving experience.
4th Place: Debica / Presto UHP 2 - Rated 2.6
Quick Take
Debica Presto UHP 2
The Debica Presto UHP2 demonstrates good performance, particularly in dry conditions where its braking is notable, though it trails behind the top performer. In wet scenarios, it struggles somewhat, particularly in braking, where it ranks lower, indicating an area for improvement. However, its hydroplaning resistance in lateral scenarios is commendable. The tire's noise level is relatively low, enhancing ride comfort. Wear and value are moderate, with the tire showing quicker wear compared to the best in its class. Its pricing is competitive, offering good value for its cost. Fuel consumption is average, reflecting an overall balanced but not exceptional efficiency in environmental impact.
5th Place: Dunlop / Sport Maxx RT2- Rated 2.6
Quick Take
Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2
The Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 ranks fifth, showing strong performance in specific areas while having room for improvement in others. It performs well in dry braking, coming close to the leaders, and excels in hydroplaning resistance, particularly in lateral conditions, where it tops the chart. Wet braking and handling, however, do not reach the top echelons, highlighting an aspect that could be enhanced. The tire's noise level is moderately low, contributing to a comfortable ride experience. Wear and value metrics indicate that the tire wears faster and offers less value compared to the best in its category. Its pricing is mid-range, and fuel consumption is average, reflecting an overall balanced performance with a few standout features.
6th Place: Bridgestone / Turanza 6 - Rated 2.6
Quick Take
Bridgestone Turanza 6
The Bridgestone Turanza 6 ranks sixth, showing a mixed performance across various tests. It excels in straight hydroplaning resistance, leading this category, and demonstrates the best fuel consumption rate among its peers. However, its performance in dry braking and wet conditions, including wet braking and handling on concrete, shows room for improvement. The tire maintains a decent noise level, enhancing ride comfort. In terms of wear and value, the Turanza 6 shows moderate longevity and cost-effectiveness. Its price point and abrasion rate indicate average performance compared to the best in the category.
7th Place: Fulda / SportControl 2 - Rated 2.6
Quick Take
Fulda SportControl 2
The Fulda SportControl 2 ranks seventh and excels in dry conditions with notable dry braking capabilities. It stands out in hydroplaning resistance, both in straight-line and lateral scenarios, indicating reliable performance in challenging wet conditions. However, its wet braking, especially on concrete, shows room for improvement. The tire's noise level is within an acceptable range, though not the quietest. Concerns arise with wear and value, as the tire wears faster and offers less value compared to the best in its class. Its price is competitive, and fuel consumption is average, aligning with its overall balanced but not exceptional performance.
8th Place: Hankook / Ventus Prime 4 K135 - Rated 2.7
Quick Take
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 K135
The Hankook Ventus Prime 4, placed eighth, delivers a solid performance with some notable strengths. Its dry braking is good, although it doesn't lead the pack. In wet conditions, the tire could improve, particularly in braking and handling on concrete surfaces. It performs moderately in straight hydroplaning tests and needs improvement in lateral hydroplaning scenarios. The noise level is reasonably low, contributing to a quieter ride. On the positive side, the tire is durable, as indicated by its good wear rating, and it provides excellent value with competitive pricing and outstanding fuel efficiency, being the best in its category for fuel consumption.
9th Place: Goodyear / EfficientGrip Performance 2 - Rated 2.7
Quick Take
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2, positioned ninth, shows a good balance in its performance, particularly excelling in tire longevity and offering great value for money. It provides decent braking in both dry and wet conditions but doesn't top the charts. In hydroplaning situations, the tire performs adequately, with slightly better results when turning than in straight lines. It's commendably quiet, enhancing driving comfort. Notably, it stands out for its exceptional wear characteristics, nearly leading in this aspect, and its value proposition is strong, making it a cost-effective choice. While its purchase price is on the higher side, its fuel efficiency is commendable, contributing to its overall economic performance.
10th Place: Falken / Ziex ZE310 Ecorun - Rated 2.8
Quick Take
Falken Ziex ZE310 Ecorun
The Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, positioned tenth, shows commendable performance, particularly in wet braking and hydroplaning resistance, where it ranks impressively high. In dry conditions, its braking is notable, but there is a need for better steering feedback for optimal curve handling. The tire's performance in straight hydroplaning is strong, enhancing its safety profile in wet conditions. However, its wear rate and value proposition could be improved, reflecting a faster wear and moderate cost-effectiveness. The tire's price is relatively competitive, but its fuel consumption lags slightly behind, impacting its overall efficiency rating.
11th Place: Nexen / N Fera Primus - Rated 3.0
Quick Take
Nexen N Fera Primus
The Nexen N'Fera Primus, ranked eleventh, offers balanced performance with a stronger showing in wet conditions, particularly in braking and lateral hydroplaning resistance. Its dry braking is adequate but ranks lower compared to the leaders. The tire's handling in wet conditions is commendable, though it falls short in achieving top marks, particularly in straight hydroplaning. Noise levels are moderate, and wear indicates a quicker reduction in tread life compared to the best in its class. The tire's value is mid-range, with its pricing being competitive. Fuel consumption is average, aligning with its overall efficiency profile.
12th Place: Goodride / Solmax 1 - Rated 3.0
Quick Take
Goodride Solmax 1
The Goodride Solmax 1, positioned twelfth, demonstrates areas for improvement, especially in wet and dry braking where it ranks lower in the test. Despite this, it shows better performance in straight hydroplaning, maintaining a high rating, and excels in lateral hydroplaning, where it's among the top performers. However, the tire's wear rate is a concern, indicating faster degradation compared to others. It offers an average value proposition and is priced competitively. The fuel consumption is good, aligning with the category's average, but the abrasion rate suggests the tire might wear out quicker than some peers.
13th Place: Sailun / Atrezzo ZSR 2- Rated 3.0
Quick Take
Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2, positioned thirteenth, delivers solid performance in certain areas while highlighting improvements needed in others. Its dry and wet braking performances are commendable, ranking well among competitors. However, its handling on wet concrete shows a significant drop, indicating room for enhancement in this area. The tire performs well in noise reduction, boasting the lowest noise level among its peers. Its hydroplaning resistance in straight-line scenarios is good, but its performance in lateral hydroplaning could be better. The wear rate is a concern, indicating quicker wear than the best in its class. It offers good value for its price and excels in fuel consumption, demonstrating top efficiency in this category.
14th Place: Semperit / Speed-Life 3 - Rated 3.1
Quick Take
Semperit Speed-Life 3
The Semperit Speed-Life 3, ranked fourteenth, demonstrates a mixed performance across various tests. Its dry braking distance is the longest among its peers, indicating a significant area for improvement. In contrast, its wet braking performance is better but still not top-tier. The tire performs adequately in hydroplaning resistance, particularly in straight-line tests, where it ranks well. However, its lateral hydroplaning resistance and noise levels are areas where enhancements could be beneficial. On the positive side, the tire shows good wear resistance and offers excellent value, with a competitive price-to-performance ratio. Its fuel consumption is also commendable, showcasing efficiency.
15th Place: Linglong / Sport Master SA220 - Rated 3.3
Quick Take
Linglong Sport Master SA220
The Linglong Sport Master, positioned fifteenth, demonstrates a commendable dry braking performance, ranking second, which is notably close to the top performer. However, its capabilities in wet conditions and hydroplaning resistance need enhancement. Despite a strong showing in noise reduction, being one of the quietest in the test, the tire's wear rate is a significant concern, showing much faster degradation compared to the best. The tire offers excellent value and the best pricing in the category. Fuel consumption is average, aligning with the majority in this group, and its abrasion resistance is moderate, indicating a need for improvement to match the top performers.
16th Place: Vredestein / Ultrac - Rated 3.8
Quick Take
Vredestein Ultrac
The Vredestein Ultrac, in the sixteenth position, demonstrates strong performance in certain key areas but falls short in others. Its dry braking is proficient, ranking seventh, and it excels in wet conditions, particularly in hydroplaning resistance where it leads. However, its wet braking and handling on concrete show room for improvement. The tire's exceptional performance in straight hydroplaning and top-ranking in lateral hydroplaning indicates its reliable wet road capabilities. Noise levels are moderate, and the tire's wear rate is notably rapid, indicating a shorter lifespan compared to competitors. The value and price metrics suggest that it's less cost-effective, and its abrasion rate is the highest, indicating higher material wear.
