Ultra-high-performance tires are built for grip, stability, and control at high speeds. They’re used on cars with tight suspension setups, wide wheels, and rear- or all-wheel drive systems that put real stress on the contact patch.
This test compared seven popular summer tires in 245/35 R20 and 295/30 R20 sizes. The goal was to evaluate how they perform in a range of conditions—wet braking, dry handling, hydroplaning resistance, and more. Some models delivered balanced, predictable performance. Others showed clear weaknesses that limit their use on performance vehicles.
Wet
Performance in the wet showed clear separation between models. Continental SportContact 7 delivered one of the shortest braking distances at just over 43 meters from 100 km/h. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 followed closely, with all three maintaining stability and consistent deceleration under pressure.
Wet Handling
- Continental
- Nexen
- Goodyear
- Michelin
- Falken
- Vredestein
- Gripmax
Info! Wet handling, km/h.
Wet Braking
- Continental
- Michelin
- Goodyear
- Nexen
- Falken
- Vredestein
- Gripmax
Info! Wet braking in meters (100-0 km/h).
In wet handling, Goodyear stood out with direct steering and reliable cornering grip. Michelin offered smoother inputs with a balanced feel, while both kept the car composed through changing radius turns. Vredestein and Falken provided safe but less precise responses, particularly near the edge of grip.
Hydroplaning tests highlighted Nexen as a strong performer, resisting floatation longer than expected for its class. Continental and Goodyear also maintained lateral control well into deeper water. In contrast, one budget tire lost contact early and gave little steering feedback, making recovery difficult. At steady cornering speeds, most top-tier tires remained balanced with progressive slip. Continental stood out again with high lateral grip and minimal deviation, making the car easy to place. By contrast, Vredestein and Gripmax showed early oversteer, with the rear stepping out before the driver had time to respond. These behaviors don't always show in lap times — but they do matter when the road curves sharply mid-rain.
Straight Hydroplaning
- Nexen
- Continental
- Vredestein
- Gripmax
- Goodyear
- Michelin
- Falken
Info! Float speed, (km/h).
Lateral Hydroplaning
- Continental
- Vredestein
- Goodyear
- Michelin
- Nexen
- Gripmax
- Falken
Info! Lateral acceleration, m/s².
Gripmax Status Pro Sport was the weakest overall in wet conditions. Braking distances exceeded 54 meters, and during handling tests, it struggled to stay on line and lost rear-end stability mid-corner. Combined with vague hydroplaning behavior, it offered limited control when it mattered most.
Wet Circle
- Continental
- Michelin
- Goodyear
- Falken
- Nexen
- Vredestein
- Gripmax
Info! Lap time, (in seconds).
Dry
On dry pavement, the best tires showed why they lead the segment. Continental SportContact 7 once again delivered the shortest braking distance — just over 31 meters from 100 km/h. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 and Bridgestone Potenza Sport followed within a meter, proving their consistency in high-speed stops.
In dry handling, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stood out with fast turn-in and strong lateral grip. Michelin offered slightly softer steering feel but kept the car composed during quick transitions. Bridgestone leaned more toward stability than agility — secure, but slower to react in sudden maneuvers.
At the lower end, Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Ceat SportDrive struggled to keep pace. Turn-in felt vague, and mid-corner feedback was limited. One tire in particular — Giti GitiSport S2 — showed delayed response at the front and instability at the rear, requiring constant corrections at higher speeds.
Dry Braking
- Continental
- Michelin
- Falken
- Goodyear
- Nexen
- Vredestein
- Gripmax
Info! Dry braking in meters (100-0 km/h).
Dry Handling
- Michelin
- Continental
- Goodyear
- Nexen
- Falken
- Vredestein
- Gripmax
Info! Dry handling in km/h.
For drivers who demand predictable behavior and sharp reflexes, the performance gap here isn’t just technical — it’s tangible on the road.
Noise & Rolling Resistance
While not the focus of this test, comfort and efficiency still matter — especially on long drives or mixed-use cars.
Vredestein offered the quietest ride and lowest rolling resistance, making it a strong choice for daily use or long-distance touring. Michelin also found a good balance, keeping cabin noise low without compromising grip.
Goodyear had the highest rolling resistance of the group, trading some fuel efficiency for outright performance.
Noise
- Vredestein
- Nexen
- Gripmax
- Continental
- Goodyear
- Michelin
- Falken
Info! External noise level in dB.
Rolling Resistance
- Vredestein
- Gripmax
- Michelin
- Continental
- Nexen
- Falken
- Goodyear
Info! Rolling resistance in kg/t.
Falken was the loudest tire on test, with noticeable road noise over coarse surfaces. Other models landed somewhere in the middle — livable, but not standout in either direction.
Conclusion – Grip Isn’t Optional
The best tires in this test didn’t just stop fast — they inspired confidence through every discipline. Whether in rain, heat, or deep water, they stayed predictable and safe.
A few competitors held close. One budget option impressed with wet performance. Another model proved ideal for quiet daily use. But one tire failed repeatedly across key categories — and doesn’t belong on any car that values safety or control. Buy the tire that performs when conditions are worst. Because that’s when it matters most.
Results
1st Place: Continental / SportContact 7
Quick Take
Continental SportContact 7
The Continental SportContact 7 dominated this test, with best-in-class performance in wet and dry braking, lateral grip, and overall handling. It remained composed under pressure and delivered precise control in every scenario — from deep water to sudden transitions. Its only downside is slightly higher noise and rolling resistance than the most comfort-focused models, but for performance driving, it’s the clear winner. Best-in-class across wet handling, dry braking, and overall balance at the limit.
2nd Place: Michelin / Pilot Sport 5
Quick Take
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 offered exceptional braking, balanced steering, and strong grip in both dry and wet conditions. It wasn’t the sharpest tire on track, but made up for it with refined composure and quiet road manners. A great all-rounder that blends performance with everyday comfort — especially suited for fast daily drivers. Combines precision with everyday comfort, ideal for spirited commuting and weekend drives.
3rd Place: Goodyear / Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Quick Take
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 delivered standout dry handling and responsive steering. It was also strong in the wet, with dependable cornering grip. However, its higher rolling resistance and average comfort may deter those looking for long-distance efficiency. Best suited for drivers who prioritize precision and agility. Exceptional dry handling and razor-sharp steering, though with higher rolling resistance.
4th Place: Nexen / N Fera Sport
Quick Take
Nexen N Fera Sport
Nexen N’Fera Sport SU2 surprised with its wet performance — maintaining stability and resisting hydroplaning well above expectations for its class. It offered great value and decent feedback, although it couldn’t match the top-tier competitors in dry grip or ultimate sharpness. A solid budget-friendly choice for confident wet-weather control. Strong wet grip and stability at a fraction of the premium price, without major compromises.
5th Place: Falken / Azenis FK520
Quick Take
Falken Azenis FK520
The Falken Azenis FK520 delivered safe, predictable performance, particularly in dry braking. However, it struggled in wet handling and was the loudest tire in the test. A good choice for dry climates or drivers prioritizing affordability over all-weather finesse.
6th Place: Vredestein / Ultrac Pro
Quick Take
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Vredestein Ultrac Pro excelled in rolling resistance and cabin noise, making it a standout for commuting and comfort. But its performance under pressure — especially in sudden wet transitions and rear-end stability — fell behind the competition. Best suited for relaxed drivers who want efficiency more than edge. Quiet, fuel-efficient, and well-suited to relaxed driving, though less confidence under pressure.
7th Place: Gripmax / SureGrip Pro Sport
Quick Take
Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport
Gripmax Status Pro Sport was the weakest across most categories. It had the longest braking distances in both wet and dry conditions, vague handling, and poor stability in corners. Combined with early hydroplaning and unpredictable rear-end behavior, it’s not a safe choice for any high-performance application. Long stopping distances, poor wet handling, and unpredictable behavior make it unsafe for any performance application.
