The BF Goodrich g-Force Winter 2 stands out as a snow specialist, offering top-tier performance on snowy surfaces, complemented by quiet passing noise. However, its performance on wet roads is average, with slightly extended wet braking distances. This tire shines in wintry conditions but leaves room for improvement in wet grip, making it a solid yet not flawless choice for winter driving.

The BF Goodrich g-Force Winter 2 (91 H) achieved a "good" rating and shared ninth place in the test. It has an EU label of D/B/A with a noise level of 69 dB and is priced around €380 per set. This tire excels on snow and ice, offering top-tier traction and braking performance, making it a reliable option in harsh winter conditions. It also provides solid hydroplaning resistance and a quiet ride, adding to its appeal for drivers seeking comfort. However, its braking performance on wet roads is slightly longer than ideal, which is its main drawback. Overall, the BF Goodrich g-Force Winter 2 is a strong contender for winter driving, particularly for those prioritizing snow and ice performance.

The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 excels in snow performance and demonstrates proficient handling in both dry and wet conditions. Its resistance to longitudinal aquaplaning is a key feature, enhancing safety and control. However, the tire's braking performance on dry pavement is an area where improvements could be beneficial.

The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 tires excel in braking performance on dry pavement and stand out for their long tread life and low particulate emissions, highlighting their durability and environmental friendliness. These tires are also economical, making them a cost-effective choice. However, they fall short in dry handling due to less informative feedback. In wet conditions, they are susceptible to understeer and oversteer, affecting their overall wet handling performance. Despite these drawbacks, they provide good handling in snowy conditions.

Snow professional with very good driving performance on packed snow, good aquaplaning reserves, pleasantly quiet driving comfort. Slightly longer wet braking distances, high price.

Good on snow and ice. Low wear. Weaknesses on dry and wet roads.

The next ten of the final twenty is topped by the BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2.
Pros: convincing ice and snow performance, consistent handling response on wet pavement, good aquaplaning resistance.
Cons: delayed steering response on dry pavement.

Winter king with the best driving characteristics on snow, quiet pass-by noise. Average wet traction, slightly longer wet braking distances.

Good performance on dry surfaces and snow. Top marks for wear and fuel consumption. Relatively poor wet performance.

Positive: Excellent snow performance. Good dry performance with relatively long braking distances.
Negative: Poor wet performance. High rolling resistance.
Verdict: Good.

Positive: The best braking performance on the dry pavement; good ice handling. Negative: Weak lateral grip on snow; weak grip and poor handling on ice.

Positive: very good snow performance, low rolling noise, low rolling resistance.
Negative: understeering wet and dry handling, extended wet braking distances.

Winter professional with good snow performance, weaknesses on wet roads.

Positive: very good snow performance, low noise, low rolling resistance.
Negative: understeering wet and dry handling, extended wet braking distances.
Verdict: satisfactory.

Pros: good environmental performance, convincing handling response on snow, good hydroplaning resistance, high resistance to wear and long tread life.
Cons: Increased rolling resistance

The seventh line in the final standings was scored by the relatively inexpensive BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 that demonstrated great performance on snow and wet pavement, good hydroplaning resistance, little cabin noise, and long expected mileage. At the same time, the tire’s dry traction was described as average.

The winter kings, winning the snow tests, excellent aquaplaning results, good ride comfort. Slow steering, understeer in the dry.

Top marks in the snow, low fuel consumption and wear. Slightly weaker in the wet and dry when compared to the best.