Test World: Winter Tire Test R16 2020
The Finnish organization ran a comparative test of 21 studded and friction winter tires.
The new test conducted by the independent Finnish organization Test World involved more than twenty studded and friction winter tires belonging to different price brackets. As always, the tires were tested on ice, snow, and wet and dry pavement. In addition, the experts were evaluating their noise emission, environmental performance, and road holding ability on uneven surfaces.
-
Continental IceContact 3 - Winner Recommended86 51Verdict:Snow Braking Wet Braking Dry Handling Acceleration on Ice Ice Handling Wet Handling Ice Braking Snow Handling Acceleration on Snow
Positive: Short stopping distance and good lateral stability on ice (but a risk of a skid during an emergency maneuver). Good handling and overall control on snow. Good handling response on asphalt.
Europe · Russia+Test Score:8.9 -
Michelin X-Ice North 4 Recommended92 52Verdict:Dry Braking Snow Braking Wet Braking Dry Handling Acceleration on Ice Ice Handling Ice Braking Lateral Stability Snow Handling Acceleration on Snow Fuel Consumption Noise Wet Handling
Positive: Excellent handling response on ice — the tires maintain dependable grip in any situation, for example, when unexpectedly hitting an ice-covered surface while cornering. Good handling response and high safety level on snow. On wet pavement, the tires keep reliable grip during an emergency maneuver.
Negative: Prone to understeer on dry pavement. Increased rolling resistance.Canada · Europe · Russia+Test Score:8.9 -
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 Recommended83 52Verdict:Acceleration on Ice Ice Handling Ice Braking Lateral Stability Snow Handling Acceleration on Snow Dry Handling Noise
Positive: Excellent grip and very good handling response on ice. Good handling response on snow (the tires will not bring you any unpleasant surprises in any situation). Good road holding ability.
Negative: Inaccurate steering response and prone to abrupt loss of grip on dry pavement.USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+Test Score:8.6 -
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R384 54Verdict:Noise Dry Braking Dry Handling Wet Handling Ice Handling Fuel Consumption Snow Handling Lateral Stability
Positive: No prominent issues found. Short braking distance and great handling response on ice. The tires ensure reliable grip in any situation. Very good handling response and confident behavior on snow. On dry and wet pavement, the tire’s performance was above average, which can be considered a serious achievement because successfully combining high traction on ice/snow and asphalt is quite a tall order. The steering response was somewhat delayed, but the tires kept up stable grip on the rear axle during an emergency maneuver. Low noise emission. Low rolling resistance.
Negative: The road holding ability could have been better.USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+ · JapanTest Score:8.3 -
Bridgestone Noranza 00175 38Verdict:Acceleration on Ice Ice Handling Ice Braking Snow Handling Acceleration on Snow Dry Braking Fuel Consumption Noise Wet Handling
Positive: Good overall performance on ice (but if you make an abrupt turn of the steering wheel, the grip on the rear axle is not reliable enough). Confident behavior on snow.
Negative: Long braking distance on snow, dry, and wet pavementInaccurate steering response, and prominently prone to rear axle skid when driving on asphalt. Already an old model, and this is beginning to show through.Europe · Russia+Test Score:8.2 -
Continental VikingContact 790 55Verdict:Noise Snow Braking Wet Handling Ice Handling Fuel Consumption Lateral Stability Snow Handling Acceleration on Snow Dry Handling
Positive: Short braking distance and great handling response on ice. Optimum control in any situation on snow. Good handling response on wet pavement — the steering response is somewhat delayed but the tires ensure stable performance without any unpleasant surprises.
Negative: Prone to grip loss on the rear axle during an emergency maneuver on dry pavement.USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+ · East AsiaTest Score:8.1 -
Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 W42983 40Verdict:Wet Traction Dry Handling Ice Traction Wet Braking Dry Braking Noise Ice Braking
Positive: Good traction on ice. Good handling response and reliable grip on wet pavement.
Negative: Relatively long braking distance and prone to oversteer on ice. Prone to oversteer on snow. Delayed steering response and average braking performance on dry pavement.USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+Test Score:8.1 -
Michelin X-Ice Snow82 57Verdict:Snow Braking Dry Handling Wet Handling Fuel Consumption Lateral Stability Snow Handling Acceleration on Snow Dry Braking Wet Braking
Positive: Short braking distance on ice (for non-studded tires). Good handling response and high safety level on snow. The tires keep up reliable grip on asphalt during an emergency maneuver (even though the steering response is somewhat inaccurate).
Negative: The steering response on ice is somewhat delayed — but the tires ensure stable performance in any situation. Relatively long braking distance on asphalt.USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+ · Japan · ChinaTest Score:8 -
Linglong GREEN-Max Winter Grip 2N/A 25Verdict:Lateral Stability Dry Braking Acceleration on Ice Ice Braking Dry Handling Fuel Consumption Wet Handling
Positive: Short braking distance on ice. Logic behavior on snow. Short braking distance on dry pavement.
Negative: Insufficient steering feedback and handling response on ice. Delayed steering response on asphalt. High rolling resistance. Unbalanced overall performance.EuropeTest Score:7.9 -
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 286 40Verdict:Snow Braking Dry Handling Wet Handling Fuel Consumption Lateral Stability Dry Braking Snow Handling Ice Traction
Positive: Excellent traction and short braking distance on ice. Short stopping distance and good handling response on wet pavement. Low rolling resistance.
Negative: Relatively low lateral stability on ice, due to which the tires may lose grip during an emergency maneuver. Prone to understeer on snowInaccurate steering response on dry pavement (yet the tires tackle emergency maneuvers with no problem).USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+Test Score:7.8 -
Pirelli Ice Zero FR85 40Verdict:Ice Handling Noise Acceleration on Snow Lateral Stability Wet Braking
Positive: Short braking distance on dry pavement.
Negative: Unstable behavior on ice and snow. At first, the tires demonstrate excellent lateral stability and handling response but then they may abruptly lose grip — and may recover it just as abruptly. Very long braking distance, relatively weak lateral stability and inaccurate steering response on wet pavement. Insufficient road holding ability.USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+ · ChinaTest Score:7.8 -
Hankook Winter i*cept iZ 2 W61678 30Verdict:Lateral Stability Dry Handling Wet Handling Fuel Consumption Ice Handling Wet Braking
Positive: Logic behavior without any unpleasant surprises on snow. Low rolling resistance. On dry pavement, the tires demonstrate delayed response to the driver’s actions, at the same time ensuring dependable grip on the rear axis.
Negative: Unstable behavior on wet pavement. Risk of going into a skid during an emergency maneuver on ice.USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+Test Score:7.7 -
Kontio IcePawN/A 19Verdict:Lateral Stability Acceleration on Ice Ice Braking Noise Snow Braking Dry Handling Wet Handling Snow Handling
Positive: Excellent traction and short braking distance on ice. Good road holding ability.
Negative: Low lateral stability on ice, due to which the tires lose grip on the rear axle during an emergency maneuver. Long braking distance, and prone to skidding on snow. Weak lateral grip on asphalt. High noise emission.Europe · Russia+Test Score:7.6 -
Sava Eskimo IceN/A 25Verdict:Noise Dry Handling Wet Handling Lateral Stability Acceleration on Snow Dry Braking Wet Braking
Positive: Good braking efficiency on ice. On dry pavement, the tires ensure confident overall performance, keeping stable grip on the rear axle.
Negative: Prone to grip loss on ice (at high speeds). Inaccurate steering response on wet pavement (but the tires’ overall behavior is stable). Long braking distance on dry pavement.USA+ · CanadaTest Score:7.6 -
Linglong Winter UnicornN/A 22Verdict:Snow Handling Noise Dry Handling Fuel Consumption Wet Braking
Negative: Delayed steering response on ice and snow (but the grip is rather strong). Poor grip and insufficient handling response on dry and wet pavement — the tires have problems tackling emergency maneuvers. High rolling resistance.
Europe · Russia+Test Score:7.5 -
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice69 48Verdict:Lateral Stability Dry Handling Snow Braking Snow Handling Wet Handling Wet Braking
Positive: Good handling response on snow (but the grip is generally lower than that of the leaders). Well-balanced behavior and short braking distance on dry pavement.
Negative: Prone to understeer on ice and wet pavement.Europe · Russia+ · South KoreaTest Score:7.4 -
Nankang Ice Activa 2N/A 26Verdict:Snow Handling Wet Handling Noise Acceleration on Snow Dry Braking Dry Handling Acceleration on Ice Ice Braking Lateral Stability
Positive: Acceptable handling response on snow (but the tires may lose grip too suddenly). Acceptable handling on wet pavement (even though the tires demonstrate a slightly delayed response to the driver’s actions).
Negative: Poor longitudinal grip on ice (lateral stability is slightly better). Poor traction and inaccurate steering response on dry pavement.EuropeTest Score:7.3 -
Nexen Winguard Ice Plus68 37Verdict:Dry Handling Wet Braking Acceleration on Ice Ice Handling Wet Handling Ice Braking Snow Handling
Negative: Poor grip on ice, both longitudinal and lateral. On ice, prone to skidding both on front and rear axles. Poor grip on snow during an emergency maneuver. Long braking distance and lack of control on dry and wet pavement. Insufficient road holding ability. Increased rolling resistance.
USA+ · Canada · Russia+Test Score:7 -
Petlas Glacier W661N/A 26Verdict:Dry Braking Dry Handling Wet Handling Wet Braking Snow Braking Acceleration on Ice Ice Handling Ice Braking Snow Handling
Positive: Very high braking efficiency on wet and dry pavement. Very quick and accurate steering response on wet pavement (almost like summer tires); on dry pavement the situation is even better.
Negative: Very weak traction on ice. The tires can suddenly go into a skid, taking forever to recover grip and bring the car to a standstill. When cornering on snow, the tires on the front axle quickly lose grip, after which the rear wheels go into a skid as well. Insufficient road holding ability.USA+ · CanadaTest Score:7 -
Toyo Observe GSi-669 38Verdict:Dry Braking Dry Handling Wet Braking Noise Acceleration on Ice Fuel Consumption Ice Handling Ice Braking Lateral Stability
Positive: Stable behavior on snow, including during emergency maneuvers (although the frip could be stronger). Short braking distance and good lateral stability on wet pavement (but delayed steering response). Stable behavior and short braking distance on dry pavement.
Negative: On ice, the tires lose grip too suddenly, which is detrimental to handling response. Insufficient road holding ability. High rolling resistance. Increased noise.USA+ · Canada · Europe · Russia+ · Japan · ChinaTest Score:7 -
Sunny SN3860N/A 4Verdict:Lateral Stability Dry Handling Wet Braking Snow Braking Fuel Consumption Ice Handling Ice Braking Snow Handling Acceleration on Snow
Positive: Very short braking distance on wet pavement.
Negative: The grip on ice is virtually nonexistent, and the car keeps on drifting to different sides. On snow, the situation is just as bad. Poor lateral stability, delayed steering response, and unstable behavior on wet pavement (on dry pavement the situation slightly improves).Europe · Russia+Test Score:6.3
- Year
- 2020
- Tire Test Original Link
- Visit Website
- Max Score, points
- 10
- Tire Size
- 205/55R16
- Season
- Winter
- Auto Type
- Passenger
- List Type
- Professional Tire Test
- Region
- Europe
- Date added
- Oct 17, 2020
- Date updated
- Feb 17, 2021